30 August 2026, 21:31:13 *

Login with username, password and session length
Welcome to War and Tactics!    War and Tactics Forum is currently undergoing some modifications that might disable features you are used to. This is unabvoidable as we have to update the forum engine to a new structure that is incompatible with many of the features we had used so far. The good news: WaT will be more secure and stable, and most of the features we uninstalled will be a natural part of the new structure anyway. For the rest we will be looking for solutions. (APR 23, 2018)
   
  Home   Forum   Help ! Forum Rules ! Search Calendar Donations Login Register Chat  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Share this topic on Del.icio.usShare this topic on DiggShare this topic on FacebookShare this topic on GoogleShare this topic on MySpaceShare this topic on RedditShare this topic on StumbleUponShare this topic on TechnoratiShare this topic on TwitterShare this topic on Yahoo
Author Topic: The World At War: The Ultimate Restored Edition 2010  (Read 5173 times)
Koen
Poster

****

Offline Offline

Belgium

Location: Belgium
Posts: 4215




View Profile
« on: 26 December 2010, 11:44:09 »
ReplyReply

Beware!


The World At War: The Ultimate Restored Edition 2010

what has been restored? the 4:3 ratio to 16:9, coulours/video and audio.
why? commercial reasons because 16:9 is the new standard, certainly with Blu-Ray TVs and players

http://www.amazon.co.uk/World-At-War-Ultimate-Restored/dp/B003IN7YPU/ref=sr_1_2?s=dvd&ie=UTF8&qid=1293356299&sr=1-2

some reviews/comments by people who bought it:
Quote
There are really two main considerations you need to balance over whether the new restored version of The World at War is worth purchasing on Blu-ray - on the one hand is the question of it being pan-and-scanned to fill 16:9 televisions, on the other is the fact that it is one of the most important and brilliantly-made documentary series you'll ever see.

On the question of the reformatting of the original 4:3 picture to widescreen, well the justifications made by the DVD distributor are spurious. If people really want to see the image fit the screen, let them do what they already do themselves and stretch it to fit. It's a horrible distortion of the image, but apparently a lot of people can't even notice the problem and don't particularly care. For those who do care, the cropping the top and bottom of the image by the DVD producers is nothing less than vandalism. Admittedly, before watching the new widescreen presentation, assured that it was carefully handled, I was prepared to make an exception to the Original Aspect Ratio only rule. After all, this is a series that consisting largely of talking heads and documentary footage that was hardly cinematographically composed. Well, I was wrong - the cropping is obvious and blatant, cutting the tops off buildings and heads. Framing isn't carefully done and it can't be. When there are captions on the screen (the original shaky captions, which suggests moreover that it's the original video masters that have been restored rather than the series being remastered from the original source materials), the image tilts down to the lower part of the screen, causing severe cropping at the top. The attempts to re-frame are obvious and obtrusive, the movement noticeable even as it tries to take in the credits at the end of an episode.

Quote
However, the decision to crop the top and bottom is vandalism of the highest order.....and, in response to other reviewers, it doesn't matter if you get used to it! You can get used to scars, too. It's a evolutionary process called 'Adaption'.

Quote
The commercial decision to crop almost 35% off the original 4x3 frame removes a huge amount of information and in the case of the interviews makes everyone look rather odd with the top of their heads removed! The war footage is not only cropped but being extended to the 16:9 width it creates a zoom effect and particularly on a big screen the picture has an over-telephoto effect that is not as pleasing to the eye as the old 4x3. Having said that the shadows have been lightened, the colors are weaker and overall the picture is noticably better.


so, as far as I can read it's better to buy the last DVD release instead of this 16:9 release
you can say that it looks better and sound better but when you loose parts of the screen the sound and colours can't make that up.
in this case as WWII docu the content (see 100% of the recordings) is more important than the looks

the one you SHOULD buy (when you can find it):
http://www.amazon.co.uk/World-At-War-Special-Collectors/dp/B000059RGE/ref=sr_1_8?s=dvd&ie=UTF8&qid=1293356299&sr=1-8

Logged
Alan65
The Postcard man
Captain
***

Offline Offline

United States

Location: Seattle
Posts: 765




View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: 27 December 2010, 03:12:50 »
ReplyReply

I agree that one should own this and watch it from time to time.  Also, the "new" release sounds like it's not worth it.  I got the 11-DVD set with bonus footage ('the making of') last year for $50.

a great documentary.
Logged
Koen
Poster

****

Offline Offline

Belgium

Location: Belgium
Posts: 4215




View Profile
« Reply #2 on: 27 December 2010, 09:13:00 »
ReplyReply

I agree that one should own this and watch it from time to time.  Also, the "new" release sounds like it's not worth it.  I got the 11-DVD set with bonus footage ('the making of') last year for $50.

a great documentary.


and I'v been waiting for a special edition for years now and finally it's here.... broken.... so it seems I have to start looking for the special DVD edition  hdbng
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Unique Hits: 54279003 | Sitemap
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines
TinyPortal v0.9.8 © Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!


Google visited last this page 27 August 2026, 12:16:27